China Justice Observer


EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Chinese Judges' Personal Rights Are Often Violated | Reading Notes of People's Court Daily

Sat, 17 Nov 2018
Categories: Insights
Contributors: Liu Qiang 刘强
Editor: C. J. Observer


Reading Notes of People's Court Daily is a series of articles written by Dr. Liu Qiang (刘强) to introduce what he learns from People's Court Daily and to share his own comments. Dr. Liu Qiang is currently a postdoctoral fellow at China Institute of Applied Jurisprudence(应用法学研究所) under China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC).

People's Court Daily is a daily newspaper managed and issued by the SPC. It mainly publishes articles written by judges from various courts across China and its readers are mainly Chinese judges and the public community who want to know about Chinese courts.

The protection of the personal rights of Chinese judges is one of the most concerned issues for them. From an investigation report made by Longyan Intermediate People's Court of Fujian Province, we can learn that the personal rights of Chinese judges are often violated. Now, the SPC is working hard to solve this problem.

"Recent years have witnessed frequent occurrence of violation against the rights and interests of judges." Huang Ermei (黄尔梅), vice president of the China Judges Association(中国法官协会) and former vice president of the SPC, said at the National Forum on the Protection of Rights and Interests of Judges (全国法院法官权益保障工作座谈会)held on 20 December 2017. 

Huang believes that to help judges perform a better duty, courts should make research on improving the status quo where judges bear excessive workload, and suffer psychological pressure and safety pressure. 

On 30 August 2018, People's Court Daily reported an article entitled "Strengthening Career Protection and Paying Attention to Physical and Mental Protection" (《加强职业保障 注重身心保护》). This article is a survey report on the protection of judges’ rights and interests, which was conducted by Longyan Intermediate People's Court. This court is located in Longyan, Fujian Province in eastern China. Situations described in this survey report may also happen to other courts in China. 

According to the article, Longyan Intermediate People’s Court set up a research team to interview 40 judges at this court and 120 judges at 7 primary people’s courts within its jurisdiction, and finally formed a survey report.

1. Violations of judges' rights and interests

 (1) Personal safety

Since 2016, there have been 10 insulting incidents, 17 incidents of defamation, 9 incidents of false accusation, 78 incidents of threatening and intimidation, 11 incidents of stalking judges and 268 incidents of harassing judges and their families via phone calls and text messages.

46.49% judges at these courts have been reviled and pestered by litigants; since 2018, three cases have happened where litigants tried to enter courts with scissors and daggers.

(2) Physical health 

Chinese courts are now facing the challenge of litigation explosion, and courts at Longyan are no exception. The explosive growth of litigations has put an extra burden on the judges, which worsens their health conditions. 

Since 2016, according to the statistics of sick leaves in these courts, the number of judges who have taken a sick leave for a specific disease and its proportion are as follows: 23 people take sick leave for cervical spine problems, accounting for 3%; 65 people for lumbar disc herniation, accounting for 8.4%; 8 for diabetes, accounting for 1.03%; 2 for heart disease, accounting for 0.26%; and 632 have suffered insomnia due to work stress, accounting for 82%.

(3) Mental health

Some judges are under huge psychological pressure and have no access to effective treatment.

Their psychological pressure mainly comes from three aspects: First, the SPC has exposed judges to more liabilities and higher risks of disciplinary punishment in the latest round of judicial reform. Second, the litigation explosion has increased judges’ work; Third, judges and their families are harmed or threatened by litigants and other personnel, or they hear of such experiences of their peers in other courts in China.

2. Reasons why these violations occur

(1) Failure to take reasonable precautions

Among the judges surveyed, 120 judges said that they would choose to keep silent in most cases when their rights are violated.

(2) Insufficient security measures at courts

Among them, 60 judges believe that security at detached tribunals is weak and security measures are poor. Almost none of the 17 detached tribunals in the city’s primary people’s courts have judicial policies dedicated to security.

(3) Imperfect relief measures for judges’ rights and interests 

Forty of these judges hold that the current relief and the protective measures for the rights and interests of judges, like penalties, have not been effectively put into action and thus offenders infringe judges’ rights without getting punishment, deterrence or warning that they deserve. This lead to the repeated violation of judges’ personal rights. 

3. Feasible solutions proposed by the research team

(1) Strengthen security measures

On the one hand, the Chinese judicial system should strengthen the punishment of any infringement of judges’ rights. On the other hand, each court should ensure adequate security arrangement and conduct strict security checks.

(2) Improve mental health

On the one hand, mental health education should be included as part of the continuing professional development of judges. On the other hand, the Judges Association and the Judges' Rights Protection Committee (法官权益保障委员会) should provide assistance to judges in improving their mental health.

(3) Manage stress

Judges should learn to deal with stress. For example, judges can relax by adopting a healthy lifestyle and a healthy diet.



If you would like to discuss with us about the post, or share your views and suggestions, please contact Ms. Meng Yu ( ).

If you wish to receive news and gain deep insights on Chinese judicial system, please feel free to subscribe to our newsletters ( ).

Contributors: Liu Qiang 刘强

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beijing Chaoyang Court Issues White Paper on Foreign-Related Family Cases

In September 2023, Beijing's Chaoyang Court released a white paper on foreign-related family cases, highlighting key insights from 717 cases spanning 2018-2022, with divorce and inheritance disputes accounting for the majority, and addressing procedural and substantive issues in eight typical cases.

Beijing Convention on Judicial Sale of Ships Signed In Beijing

In September 2023, the UN Convention on the International Effects of Judicial Sales of Ships (the "Beijing Convention on the Judicial Sale of Ships") opened for signature. It is believed to be the first United Nations convention in the field of maritime law to be named after a Chinese city.

SPC Adjusts Standards for Its Case Retrials

In August 2023, China’s Supreme People’s Court(SPC) issued the “Guiding Opinions on Strengthening and Standardizing the Work of Elevated Jurisdiction and Retrial of Cases” (关于加强和规范案件提级管辖和再审提审工作的指导意见). According to the Guiding Opinions, the SPC has relaxed the standards for its retrial of civil and administrative cases.

China Sees Lawyer Boom over 5 Years, But Legal Services Market Lags

In July 2023, China’s Ministry of Justice(MOJ) released the “2022 Annual Statistical Analysis of Lawyers and Grassroots Legal Service Work”. The number of lawyers in China is growing by more than 10% per year, but the caseload has even experienced negative growth.

Beijing Court Issues 2022 Annual Report on Judicial Review Cases in Domestic Arbitration

In July 2023, the Beijing Fourth Intermediate Court (BFIC) released its “2022 Annual Report on Judicial Review Cases in Domestic Arbitration”. As a court with jurisdiction over two of the largest arbitration institutions in China, namely the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC) and Beijing Arbitration Commission (BAC), BFIC is a major player in China’s arbitration landscape.