China Justice Observer


EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

Does the Jury Exist in China?

Fri, 21 Feb 2020
Categories: Insights

No, but people’s assessors exist in China, who, together with judges, will form a collegial panel to hear cases in specific circumstances.

There is no jury in China, instead, there are people’s assessors. In particular cases, people’s assessors and judges will form a collegial panel to hear cases together.

I. How do people’s assessors hear cases?

In particular cases, people’s assessors will take part in a collegial panel to hear cases with judges, in which only judges can act as the presiding judge.

According to China’s Civil Procedure Law (CPL), the people’s assessors have equal rights and obligations as judges. [1]Therefore, in the court, they sit at the bench.

Generally, there may be a three-member collegial panel composed of at least one judge and one-two people’s assessors, or a seven-member collegial panel composed of three judges and four people’s assessors.

The people’s assessors have the same “one person, one vote” right as judges in the collegial panel, which follows the principle of majority rule.

In the three-member collegial panel, the people's assessors can independently express opinions and exercise the voting rights regarding the fact-finding and application of law.

However, in the seven-member collegial panel, the people’s assessors can only express opinions and make their votes independently on fact-finding; while regarding the application of law, they can only express opinions but are excluded from voting.

The court chooses people’s assessors randomly from their list.

II. What kind of cases can be heard by the people’s assessors?

People’s assessors can only participate in cases of the first instance, as prescribed by Article 39 of CPL. More detailed regulations are provided in the “Law of the People's Republic of China on People's Assessors”(人民陪审员法) in 2018 and its judicial interpretation, i.e. the “Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of the Law of the People's Republic of China on People's Assessors” (最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国人民陪审员法》若干问题的解释) in 2019.

Where a criminal, civil, or administrative case of first instance falls under any of the following circumstances, the case shall be tried by a collegial panel composed of people’s assessors and judges:   

(1) involving the interests of a certain group or public interests;

(2) attracting extensive attention of the general public or otherwise having great social impacts;

(3) the complexity of the case or other circumstances requires people’s assessors to participate in the trial.

The following cases of first instance shall be heard by a seven-member collegial panel consisted of people’s assessors and judges:

(1) criminal cases with great social impacts where fixed-term imprisonment of no less than ten years, life imprisonment or death penalty may be sentenced;

(2) public welfare lawsuits filed in accordance with the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China and the Administrative Litigation Law of the People’s Republic of China;

(3) cases with great social impacts, involving land requisition and house demolition, ecology and environment protection, and food and drug safety;

(4) other cases with great social impacts.

Additionally, where the defendant to a criminal case of first instance, plaintiff or defendant to a civil case, or plaintiff to an administrative case files an application for people’s assessors to participate in the collegial panel of the trial, the people’s court may decide whether to form a collegial panel composed of people’s assessors and judges.

People’s assessors shall not participate in the trial of the following cases:

(1) cases of second instance; [2]

(2) civil cases tried under the summary procedure, which shall be tried by a sole judge; [3]

(3) cases that are subject to trial under special procedures, the procedure of urge and supervision, and the procedure for publicizing public notice for assertion of claims in accordance with the CPL;

(4) cases on applying for recognition of a divorce judgment made by a foreign court;

(5) cases that are rejected by a ruling or cases of which the court trial is not required; [4]

(6) cases in which the people’s assessor has previously mediated as a people’s mediator. [5]

III. How do people’s assessors generate?

People’s assessors are generated through the following steps.

Firstly, the Bureaus of Justice of local governments, the courts at primary level and the public security organs in that jurisdiction shall randomly select from local permanent residents under its jurisdiction as candidates of people’s assessors, and then conduct qualification examination of the candidates, and solicit their opinions.

Secondly, the Bureaus of Justice of local governments and the courts at primary level shall randomly select and determine people’s assessors from the candidates' list.

Thirdly, the presidents of the people’s courts at primary level shall request the standing committee of the people’s congresses at the same level to appoint such people’s assessors.

Eligible people’s assessors should meet the following requirements:

(1) Chinese citizens;

(2) having reached the age of 28; and

(3) having good ethics and being in good health.

Whoever falls under any of the following circumstances is not qualified to serve as a people’s assessor: [6]

(1) members of the standing committees of people’s congresses, and staff of supervisory committees, people’s courts, people’s procuratorates, public security organs, state safety organs, and administrative organs of justice;

(2) lawyers, notaries, arbitrators, and basic legal service workers;

(3) whoever having been given a criminal penalty;

(4) whoever are dismissed from public office;

(5) whoever has his or her lawyer’s or notary’s practicing license revoked;

(6) whoever is included in the list of dishonest judgment debtors;

(7) whoever having been removed from the post of people’s assessors due to disciplinary measures;

(8) persons who are unfit to serve as people’s assessors due to other post-related reasons, or those having committed other serious offenses or disciplinary violations which may affect judicial credibility.

IV. Relevant resources

For more information about the people’s assessors in China, you may refer to the following laws and regulations:

(1) “The Law of the People's Republic of China on People's Assessors (2018)”(人民陪审员法(2018));

(2) “The Measures for the Selection and Appointment of People’s Assessors (2018)” issued by the Ministry of Justice (司法部《人民陪审员选任办法(2018)》);

(3) “Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues concerning the Application of the Law of the People's Republic of China on People's Assessors(2019)”(最高人民法院关于适用《中华人民共和国人民陪审员法》若干问题的解释(2019));

(4) “The Measures for the Training, Appraisal, Rewards and Punishments for People’s Assessors (2019)” issued by the Supreme People’s Court and the Ministry of Justice. (最高人民法院、司法部《人民陪审员培训、考核、奖惩工作办法(2019)》)).


Other posts you may also be interested in are as follows:

How Do Elections in China Work?

What is the Crime Rate in China?

How Many Crimes Are Punishable by Death in China?

What is the Court System Like in China?

What's Chinese Legal System? 

Does the Jury Exist in China?

What Are the Main Laws in China?

What is the Conviction Rate in China?

Does China Have Common Law? 

For more interesting posts about Chinese Law, please check China Law in One Minute.




[1] 《民事诉讼法》第三十九条 人民法院审理第一审民事案件,由审判员、陪审员共同组成合议庭或者由审判员组成合议庭。合议庭的成员人数,必须是单数。 适用简易程序审理的民事案件,由审判员一人独任审理。 陪审员在执行陪审职务时,与审判员有同等的权利义务。

[2] 《民事诉讼法》第四十条 人民法院审理第二审民事案件,由审判员组成合议庭。合议庭的成员人数,必须是单数。

[3] 《民事诉讼法》第三十九条 适用简易程序审理的民事案件,由审判员一人独任审理。

[4] 最高人民法院《关于适用<中华人民共和国人民陪审员法>若干问题的解释(2019)》第五条

[5] 最高人民法院《关于适用<中华人民共和国人民陪审员法>若干问题的解释(2019)》第六条

[6] 《人民陪审员法》第六条、第七条



Cover Photo by Joakim Honkasalo( on Unsplash

Contributors: Guodong Du 杜国栋

Save as PDF

You might also like

Beijing Court Upholds Workers' Right to Offline Rest

The Beijing No. 3 Intermediate People's Court ruled that workers are entitled to overtime pay for “invisible overtime work” conducted via social media outside of working hours, protecting their right to “offline rest”.

China Launches People's Courts Case Database for Public

In February 2024, China's Supreme People's Court launched the People's Courts Case Database, which provides public access to authoritative case references and aims to ensure consistent application of laws. This Database is intended to complement, rather than replace, the China Judgments Online, a flagship platform of China’s open justice that has been operational since 2013.

SPC Releases Typical Cases of Judicial Review of Arbitration

In January 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released ten typical cases of judicial review of arbitration, aiming to unify the standards for judicial review of arbitration across the country. Among others, Case No.1 shows that the Chinese court confirmed the validity of an arbitration agreement despite an unregistered company seal.

SPC Issues Judicial Interpretation on Betrothal Gift Disputes

In November 2023, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued a judicial interpretation addressing betrothal gift disputes, prohibiting demands for property by marriage and providing guidelines for handling betrothal gift disputes in short marriages.

SPC Improves Mechanism for Court Notice Publication

In January 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued a notice to improve the management of court notice publication. All court notices will be published on the China Court Website and simultaneously pushed to the Tencent Website (Tencent News).

SPC Releases Typical Cases of Punitive Damages for Food Safety

In November 2023, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released typical cases of punitive damages for food safety, emphasizing consumer rights protection and highlighting instances of tenfold compensation awarded to consumers for food safety violations.

Thus Spoke Chinese Judges on Cross-border Service of Process: Insights from Chinese Supreme Court Justices on 2023 Civil Procedure Law Amendment (2)

The 2023 Civil Procedure Law adopts a problem-oriented approach, addressing difficulties in the service of process for foreign-related cases by expanding channels and shortening the service by publication period to 60 days for non-domiciled parties, reflecting a broader initiative to enhance efficiency and adapt legal procedures to the complexities of international litigation.