China Justice Observer

中司观察

EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

What Does the PRC Judges Law Say?

Sun, 12 Apr 2020
Categories: Insights

avatar

 

The PRC Judges Law was enacted in 1995 and has been amended three times respectively in 2001, 2007 and 2019.

The current PRC Judges Law consists of 69 articles, the core parts of which include: (1) the duties, rights, and obligations of judges; (2) the qualification requirements of judges and selection of judges; (3) the appointment and removal of judges; (4) management of judges by courts; (5) evaluation, awards and punishment of judges; and (6) safeguards for professional rights of judges.

The amended PRC Judges Law in 2019 reflects the experience from the judicial reform of Chinese courts since in 2014, especially the reformative measures related to the judicial accountability system that CJO posts have introduced.

We'll introduce some interesting parts of the PRC Judges Law.

1. Duties, rights and obligations of judges

The amended PRC Judges Law in 2019 broadens the judges' confidentiality obligation, i.e., in addition to the state secrets and non-public information in the trial, Chinese judges also need to keep confidential the trade secrets and personal privacy that come to their knowledge.

The amended PRC Judges Law in 2019 requires the judges to be responsible for the cases they handle within the scope of their duties and powers, which reflects the above-mentioned judicial accountability system, i.e., the judges should be held accountable for their work. However, it has not been clarified in the law prior to the amendment.

2. Who can serve as a judge?

To serve as a judge in China, the following substantive requirement must be satisfied:

(1) to be of the nationality of the People’s Republic of China;

(2) to have a bachelor’s degree or other higher degrees in law major from higher education institutions;

(3) to have a bachelor's degree or other higher degrees not in law major from higher education institutions but with a Juris Master’s degree (J.M.), a degree of Master of Laws (LL.M.), or other higher degrees;

(4) to have a bachelor's degree or other higher degrees not in law major from higher education institutions but with professional knowledge of law;

(5) to have engaged in legal practice for at least five years; but the requirement for minimum working years for the legal practice can be relaxed to 4 years in the case of getting a Juris Master’s degree (J.M.) and a degree of Master of Laws (LL.M.), or 3 years in the case of getting a Doctor of Law degree;

(6) to pass the national unified legal professional qualification examination to obtain the legal professional qualification.

The amended PRC Judges Law in 2019 lifted the minimum age limit for judges, which was previously 23. Instead, professional thresholds for judges in the aspect of educational background and working years of their legal practice have been raised. According to China's normal education pattern, it usually takes much time at least at the age of 27 to reach such thresholds.

A new provision in the amended PRC Judges Law in 2019 allows lawyers and jurists to serve as judges, among which lawyers should practice law for no less than five years. However, previously only a few courts tried to recruit judges from lawyers, and only a handful of lawyers could finally serve as judges, while the total number of judges nationwide is over 100,000.

3. Who can't serve as a judge?

These persons cannot serve as judges if:

(1) having been subject to criminal punishment for committing a crime;

(2) having been discharged from public service;

(3) having been invoked the certificates for practice as a lawyer or a notary public, or having been removed from an arbitration commission.

4. What can't a judge do?

To start with, below are a list of things that a judge is not allowed to do:

(1) A judge may not concurrently serve as a member of the Standing Committee of National People's Congress, but may be elected a deputy to the National People's Congress;

(2) A judge may not concurrently hold the posts at administrative organs, supervisory organs or procuratorial organs;

(3) A judge may not concurrently hold the posts of an enterprise or other for-profit organizations or institutions;

(4)A judge may not concurrently serve as a lawyer, an arbitrator or a notary public.

The judge shall recuse himself/herself from the trial in his/her court where he/she serves as a judge if the judge's spouse, parents or children:

(1) serve as a partner or founder in a law firm within the jurisdiction of the court where the judge serves, instead of acting as a non-partner lawyer of a law firm;

(2) serve as an agent ad litem or defender as a lawyer within the jurisdiction of the court where the judge serves, or provide other paid legal services for the parties to legal proceedings, instead of providing free legal services, or handling matters other than the legal proceedings.

After resigning from the court, a judge may not act as an agent ad litem or a defender in the lawsuit accepted by the court where he/ she used to serve, except where he/she serves as an agent ad litem or defender as the guardian or close relative of the party.

5. How to appoint judges?

The president of courts at each level shall be elected or removed by the people's congress at the same level, and the vice presidents, members of the adjudicative committee, directors and deputy directors of trial divisions, and judges shall be appointed or removed by the standing committee of the people's congress at the same level upon the proposal of the president of those courts.

The judge election committee in provincial-level courts shall first examine the professional competence of candidates who haven’t been a judge before for the judge recruitment, and then the best candidates will be appointed as judges by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress at the corresponding level.

The judges in their first term shall firstly serve in the primary people’s courts. The judges of the intermediate people’s courts will be selected from the judges in the primary people’s courts, while the Supreme People’s Court and the high people’s court can select judges from any court at lower levels.

 

Cover Photo by Kevin Olson(https://unsplash.com/@kev01218) on Unsplash

Contributors: China Laws Portal Team

Save as PDF

Related laws on China Laws Portal

You might also like

China Intensifies Crackdown on Cross-Border Telecom Fraud

In July 2024, China's Supreme People’s Procuratorate (SPP), Supreme People’s Court (SPC), and the Ministry of Public Security released ten typical cases to highlight their intensified efforts to combat cross-border telecom and online fraud, emphasizing organized crime and emerging technologies.

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Foreign Law Ascertainment

In July 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued its first batch of typical cases to illustrate the application of foreign laws, aiming to enhance the judiciary's understanding of its 2023 judicial interpretation on ascertainment of foreign law.

SPC Releases Typical Cases of Financial Fraud

In June 2024, China’s Supreme People’s Court (SPC) released five typical cases of financial fraud, aiming to strengthen the punishment of financial fraud, protect the legitimate rights and interests of investors, and promote the sound development of the industry.

SPC Releases Guiding Cases on Minor Protection

In May 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) issued guiding cases on judicial protection for minors, addressing issues like school bullying, domestic abuse of minors, and marital guardianship.

SPC Releases Typical Cases on Yellow River Protection

In May 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released typical cases demonstrating judicial efforts to protect the Yellow River Basin's ecology, coinciding with the first anniversary of the Yellow River Protection Law.

SPC Releases Typical Labor Dispute Cases

In April 2024, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released six typical cases on labor disputes to guide similar cases, emphasizing worker rights and clarifying limitations on non-compete agreements.