China Justice Observer


EnglishArabicChinese (Simplified)DutchFrenchGermanHindiItalianJapaneseKoreanPortugueseRussianSpanishSwedishHebrewIndonesianVietnameseThaiTurkishMalay

WhatsApp/WeChat Messages as Evidence to Chinese Courts?-CTD 101 Series

Thu, 05 May 2022
Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌
Editor: C. J. Observer

International business partners are getting increasingly accustomed to using WhatsApp or WeChat to reach an agreement, send orders, modify transaction conditions and confirm performance.

This post was first published in CJO GLOBAL, which is committed to providing consulting services in China-related cross-border trade risk management and debt collection.We will explain how debt collection works in China below.

WhatsApp is the most popular instant messaging app in the world, while WeChat is the Chinese counterpart. They are also the most commonly used communication tool for businessmen in transactions with China.

The question, therefore, arises: can you present WhatsApp and WeChat messages as evidence to Chinese judges?

1. Problems

When some of your business transactions are not complied with, you may find that you will have to sue your debtor.

Then, can you use the conversations with your Chinese debtor on WhatsApp and/or WeChat as evidence in the Chinese court?

2. Chat messages as evidence

China’s Civil Code stipulates that electronic chat messages can be used as the carrier of written contracts, specifically, the parties may conclude a written contract by means of electronic data exchange, email, etc.

China’s Civil Procedure Law stipulates that electronic data such as email, electronic data exchange, mobile phone text messages, and online chat records can be used as legal evidence.

This means that you can use messages sent through WhatsApp, WeChat, Messenger, email, or SMS as evidence submitted to Chinese courts.

How do you present such evidence to a Chinese judge? Will a screenshot of the conversation suffice?

3. Conversation screenshots, notarization or forensic examination

If the other party does not deny the authenticity of the conversation screenshot in court, then the screenshot can be used as evidence.

If the other party raises an objection and thinks that the screenshot may have been tampered with by tools such as Photoshop, the best way is for a notary or an expert witness to open the mobile phone storing the raw data, confirm the source and authenticity of the data, and prove to the judge that these conversation records are authentic.




Photo by Adem AY on Unsplash


Contributors: Meng Yu 余萌

Save as PDF

You might also like

China Revises State Secrets Protection Law

China’s national legislature, the National People’s Congress, revised the State Secrets Protection Law to enhance information classification, secrecy in technological innovation, and precise protection of state secrets, effective May 1, 2024.

China Enhances Legal Aid Law Implementation

In November 2023, China’s Supreme People’s Court and other top judicial bodies jointly issued measures to implement the Legal Aid Law, clarifying responsibilities and ensuring parties' rights to legal aid.